Only these four configurations can be selected. Nothing outside the list is reachable from the application, so the residency position is always one of the following.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 — EU (Ireland)
Amazon Bedrock (Claude by Anthropic), through the Amazon Bedrock runtime endpoint in eu-west-1.
- Processing location
- European Union — Ireland (eu-west-1)
- Contracting entity
- Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL (Luxembourg)
Subprocessors for this choice
- Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL — Hosts the model and runs the request inside its own Bedrock service. Ireland (European Union)
Basis for the transfer
Inference runs in the AWS Ireland region under the AWS Data Processing Addendum, so no transfer mechanism is engaged for an EU or UK controller. For a Jersey controller the European Union is a jurisdiction the Commissioner treats as adequate, and the transfer is made on that footing under Article 66 of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018. AWS support and its own subprocessors may be located outside the EU; the AWS Data Processing Addendum incorporates standard contractual clauses for that support access, so a controller relying on adequacy alone should note that support access sits under those clauses.
Retention by the provider
Amazon Bedrock does not store prompts or model outputs after the response is returned, and does not use them to train any model. Anthropic does not receive the request: the model weights run inside AWS. Bedrock model invocation logging is a separate feature and is not switched on for Corbiere, so no prompt or response is written to a log in the customer's or our account.
Onward transfers and human review
Anthropic receives no request content under this route. AWS personnel do not access content in the ordinary course; where support access occurs it is governed by the AWS Data Processing Addendum and its standard contractual clauses.
What to record in your own processor register
Record Amazon Web Services EMEA SARL as the AI subprocessor, Ireland as the processing location, and the AWS Data Processing Addendum as the governing terms. Anthropic is not a party under this route.
Claude Sonnet 4.5 — United States
Anthropic (direct API), through the Anthropic Messages API (api.anthropic.com).
- Processing location
- United States — Anthropic does not offer a regional endpoint
- Contracting entity
- Anthropic, PBC (San Francisco, United States)
Subprocessors for this choice
- Anthropic, PBC — Runs the model and returns the response. United States
- Anthropic's own infrastructure subprocessors — Compute and hosting used by Anthropic to serve the API, as listed in its published subprocessor list. United States
Basis for the transfer
This is a transfer to the United States. Anthropic Ireland, Limited exists as the group's European company, but the seller on Claude API invoices remains Anthropic, PBC in San Francisco, so the controller is contracting with a United States entity and the transfer analysis is a transfer to a third country — not an intra-EU or adequacy case. For a Jersey controller that engages Articles 66 and 67 of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018 and requires appropriate safeguards: Anthropic's data processing addendum incorporates standard contractual clauses, and Anthropic self-certifies under the EU-US Data Privacy Framework and its UK extension. A controller choosing this option should complete and record a transfer risk assessment.
Retention by the provider
Zero data retention is not the default. By default Anthropic automatically deletes API inputs and outputs within 30 days. Zero data retention is a separate negotiated agreement, available only for eligible APIs and products. Even under such an agreement there are carve-outs: under Anthropic's Covered Models policy in force from June 2026, prompts and outputs for certain models are retained for 30 days on every platform including for zero-retention customers, and content flagged by trust and safety processes may be held considerably longer.
Onward transfers and human review
Anthropic personnel do not read request content in the ordinary course, but retained content exists and may be reviewed where trust and safety processes flag it, or where an investigation or legal obligation requires it. It is not accurate to say there is nothing to read: the accurate statement is that retained data is not read by personnel by default.
What to record in your own processor register
Record Anthropic, PBC (United States) as the AI subprocessor, standard contractual clauses in Anthropic's data processing addendum as the safeguard, a transfer risk assessment as completed, and 30-day default deletion — or the terms of any zero-retention agreement you hold directly with Anthropic — as the retention position.
This choice sends personal data outside the Jersey, United Kingdom and European Union adequacy perimeter. It is lawful only where the controller relies on appropriate safeguards and has completed and recorded a transfer risk assessment.
GPT-4.1 — UK South
Azure OpenAI Service, through the Azure OpenAI resource pinned to UK South.
- Processing location
- United Kingdom — UK South
- Contracting entity
- The Microsoft entity on the customer's Azure agreement — Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited for customers contracted in Europe
Subprocessors for this choice
- Microsoft (Azure OpenAI Service) — Hosts the Azure OpenAI resource and runs the model in Microsoft's own tenancy. UK South (United Kingdom)
Basis for the transfer
Inference runs on a resource pinned to UK South under the Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum. For an EU controller the UK adequacy decision applies; for a Jersey controller the United Kingdom is adequate under Article 66 of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018; for a UK controller no transfer arises. OpenAI does not receive the data — the model runs in Microsoft's tenancy — though Microsoft support may be provided from outside the region under the standard contractual clauses in the addendum.
Retention by the provider
By default Azure OpenAI stores prompts and generated content for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring, and authorised Microsoft reviewers may examine content flagged by that monitoring. Storage and human review stop only where Microsoft has approved modified abuse monitoring for the resource under its Limited Access programme. Do not assume the exemption: the approval status of the resource behind this option is stated on the AI settings page, and Corbiere shows this option as retaining for 30 days unless the exemption is recorded. Prompts and responses are not used to train OpenAI or Microsoft models in either case.
Onward transfers and human review
No onward transfer of request content to OpenAI. Where modified abuse monitoring has not been approved, Microsoft abuse reviewers may see flagged content; where it has, no Microsoft reviewer sees request content.
What to record in your own processor register
Record Microsoft as the AI subprocessor, UK South as the processing location, the Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum as the governing terms, and 30-day abuse-monitoring storage unless you hold Microsoft's approval for modified abuse monitoring.
GPT-4.1 — EU (Sweden Central)
Azure OpenAI Service, through the Azure OpenAI resource pinned to Sweden Central.
- Processing location
- European Union — Sweden Central
- Contracting entity
- The Microsoft entity on the customer's Azure agreement — Microsoft Ireland Operations Limited for customers contracted in Europe
Subprocessors for this choice
- Microsoft (Azure OpenAI Service) — Hosts the Azure OpenAI resource and runs the model in Microsoft's own tenancy. Sweden Central (European Union)
Basis for the transfer
Inference runs on a resource pinned to Sweden Central under the Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum and Microsoft's EU Data Boundary commitment. No transfer mechanism is engaged for an EU or UK controller; for a Jersey controller the European Union is adequate under Article 66 of the Data Protection (Jersey) Law 2018. OpenAI does not receive the data, though Microsoft support may be provided from outside the region under the standard contractual clauses in the addendum.
Retention by the provider
By default Azure OpenAI stores prompts and generated content for up to 30 days for abuse monitoring, and authorised Microsoft reviewers may examine content flagged by that monitoring. Storage and human review stop only where Microsoft has approved modified abuse monitoring for the resource under its Limited Access programme. Do not assume the exemption: the approval status of the resource behind this option is stated on the AI settings page, and Corbiere shows this option as retaining for 30 days unless the exemption is recorded. Prompts and responses are not used to train OpenAI or Microsoft models in either case.
Onward transfers and human review
No onward transfer of request content to OpenAI. Where modified abuse monitoring has not been approved, Microsoft abuse reviewers may see flagged content; where it has, no Microsoft reviewer sees request content.
What to record in your own processor register
Record Microsoft as the AI subprocessor, Sweden Central as the processing location, the Microsoft Products and Services Data Protection Addendum and the EU Data Boundary as the governing terms, and 30-day abuse-monitoring storage unless you hold Microsoft's approval for modified abuse monitoring.